And if the husband was killed in warfare, a widow in ancient Athens had few good prospects. In the only really true political scene in the play, a quasi-agon takes place between a magistrate, who represents male authority, and Lysistrata.
This is not only war, and it is not the dangers and horrors of war, but the real life frustrations of the Athenian people. For example, towards the end of the play, Reconciliation is personified into the form of a beautiful young woman whom the men cannot take their eyes off.
This is a foreshadowing of the main plotline, in which the women, using their only real source of power orchestrate the sexual starvation of the men.
You can order a custom essay on Lysistrata now! Another way Aristophanes turns grief into laughter is by describing things in terms of the human body.
It is easy to see why early Athenian women would get tired of their men leaving.
For an audience at war, this play was the ultimate form of escapist entertainment. To even consider putting a woman into a position where she was required to think outside her domestic purposes was laughable. This shows the fictional element of the play, as in Aristophanes time in Athens, both women and men were known to have numerous adulterous affairs, and if the sex strike were to be successful, then the mistresses and all such people would have to Essays on lysistrata striking also.
Some argue that Aristophanes portrayal Essays on lysistrata Lysistrata is a somewhat proto-feminist idea.
It seems that in saying this speech, Lysistrata believes that the women will finally be seen as capable of managing Athenian finances - again, an absurd idea for the original audience. The women in Lysistrata complain that the men are away at war for too long, and that they are being deprived of sex - this scenario is not merely fantasy, but must have been a familiar feeling to most, if not all adult Athenians.
This gives the impression that Aristophanes is in fact giving serious advice to the city of Athens using Lysistrata as a mouthpiece. The center of Lysistratas comedy is that it shows women acting bravely, even aggressively, against men who seem resolved on ruining the city.
Aristophanes created the play as a comedy, showing what the world would be like in the times of the Peloponnesian war if women tried to do the impossible.
This is a common method in Aristophanic plays, as metaphors or simply to talk around the subject. This scene is unusual in a number of ways: In conclusion, the plot of Lysistrata demonstrates that the overriding mode of Aristophanic comedy is fantasy.
The plot is shown to be fantasy, an absurd idea to the ancient Athenians. Aristophanes ignores possible plot problems in order to present the delightfully comic idea of a sex strike. In ancient Greece, women were looked at as property, something beautiful to own, and did not have any redeeming social values.
The Spartan equivalent of Lysistrata, Lampito, is another example. This allows the audience to further switch off from the traditionally grim motif of war and enter a fantasy where war is dismissed as being second to sexual satisfaction. This is Lysistratas one main connection with reality besides its central subject of war, and it is in this way that Aristophanes keeps the audience inside the fantasy world of Lysistrata.
Its main comedic device partly fails in our modern interpretation because of our more balanced views of women in the 21st century.
The advice within the passage is so shrouded in metaphor that it is almost impossible for there to be any serious political advice in it whatsoever.
Women are not mentioned actually taking into action any of the advice given by Lysistrata. In some ways, Lysistrata was designed as a form of escapism for the audience, and to poke fun at the very things causing them pain. Therefore we see women taking over traditionally masculine roles, another situation that could only be described as fantasy to the original audience.
Most of them were married in their teens and never knew what it was to be on their own. The only intended outcome of this situation is humour.
Role reversal is Lysistratas true humour because to imagine a woman in a multifaceted role was insane. Lysistrata deals with the sensitive and possibly offensive subject matter by parodying it.
This plays on the real life frustrations of the war torn Athenians without bringing to light the darker aspects of war. This then is the root of its humour. However, this play clearly does not promote women taking political power. The proceeding debate is interesting and poses many questions about Aristophanes political stance.The Lysistrata Community Note includes chapter-by-chapter summary and analysis, character list, theme list, historical context, author biography and quizzes written by community members like you.
Essays Related to Lysistrata. 1. Lysistrata. Knowing their physical limitations, the women decide on a plan of attack that is lead by Lysistrata. Lysistrata is the mastermind and director of the action in Lysistrata.
/5(4). An essay or paper on Lysistrata: Feminism Defined. Feminism is defined as the belief that women and men are, and have been treated differently by society, and that women have frequently and systematically been unable to participate fully in.
Lysistrata Essay. BACK; Writer’s block can be painful, but we’ll help get you over the hump and build a great outline for your paper. Read this essay on Feminism in Lysistrata. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays.
Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more. Only at mi-centre.com". Lysistrata, by Aristophanes Essay. Aristophanes’ Greek comedy, Lysistrata has been translated many times. The key to a good translation is finding one that models what the current time frame is looking for.Download